Back to Home

Beyond SELECT: SQL as a Full Development Platform

5 min read • SQL Development

If you're a data scientist or analyst, there's a good chance SQL isn't your favorite part of the job. Maybe you'd rather be in Python building models, or in R doing statistical analysis, or literally anywhere else. But here you are, writing SQL queries because that's where the data lives.

And if we're being honest, you probably think of SQL as that thing you do to get data out of databases. You write SELECT statements, maybe join a few tables, possibly GROUP BY some columns if you're feeling fancy. It's a means to an end and an end in itself, grabbing the data and getting back to the real work.

Here's what nobody tells you: that's not SQL. That's just the tip of the iceberg.

When you're doing production-grade SQL: the kind that powers actual business systems. You're not just querying databases. You're building infrastructure that needs to be fast, reliable, and maintainable. And whether you like SQL or not, understanding what it can actually do will make your life significantly easier.

Let me show you what I mean.

The Reality Check: SQL in Production

Let's talk about what production-grade SQL actually looks like not the pristine examples from tutorials, but the messy, real-world systems that need to handle millions of rows while your CEO refreshes a dashboard asking why the numbers don't match yesterday's report.

Views: Your Secret Weapon for Staying Sane

Views get dismissed as "just saved queries," which is like calling a car "just a fancy chair with wheels." Yes, technically true, but you're missing the point.

Here's what views actually do for you in production:

They hide your mistakes. Remember that time you realized your table structure was completely wrong six months into the project? Views let you fix it without breaking every query in your codebase. Change the underlying tables, update the view, and everything keeps working.

They enforce security without thinking about it. Create a view that filters out sensitive columns or rows that users shouldn't see. Grant permissions on the view, not the table. Now security happens at the data layer, not in application code that someone will inevitably forget to update.

They make complex logic reusable. That monster query with five CTEs and a window function? Put it in a view. Now you can reference it anywhere without copy-pasting 80 lines of SQL and praying you don't miss a comma.

Stored Procedures: Less Scary Than You Think

I know, I know. Stored procedures have a reputation. They're "hard to test," "impossible to version control," "that thing the DBA from 1997 used to love."

But here's the thing: when you need to update 2 million rows based on complex business logic, doing it in a stored procedure beats pulling all that data into Python, processing it, and pushing it back. It's faster, it's safer, and it doesn't crash your application server when memory runs out.

The trick is knowing when to use them. Good use cases:

  • Batch operations that touch lots of rows
  • Complex calculations that would require multiple round trips
  • Operations that need to be atomic (all or nothing)
  • Logic that multiple applications need to share

Bad use cases: Everything else. Don't put your entire business logic in stored procedures. Your coworkers will not thank you.

CTEs: Making Your Query Readable (Including to Future You)

Common Table Expressions are the difference between SQL that makes sense and SQL that makes you question your career choices at 3 AM when production is down.

Instead of this nightmare:

SELECT a.* FROM (
    SELECT b.* FROM (
        SELECT c.* FROM table1 c
        WHERE c.status = 'active'
    ) b JOIN table2 ON ...
) a WHERE ...

You get this:

WITH active_records AS (
    SELECT * FROM table1 
    WHERE status = 'active'
),
joined_data AS (
    SELECT * FROM active_records
    JOIN table2 ON ...
)
SELECT * FROM joined_data WHERE ...

Future you will actually understand what's happening. Present you can debug it. Your coworkers might even leave positive comments in the code review.

Macros: Don't Repeat Yourself

If you're using modern SQL tools like dbt, you have access to macros—basically functions that generate SQL code. They're incredibly useful when you find yourself writing the same logic over and over.

Let's say you constantly need to filter for active customers. Instead of copying this everywhere:

WHERE status = 'active' 
  AND deleted_at IS NULL 
  AND last_login > CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '90 days'

You can create a macro:

{% macro active_customers() %}
    status = 'active' 
    AND deleted_at IS NULL 
    AND last_login > CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '90 days'
{% endmacro %}

-- Then use it:
SELECT * FROM customers
WHERE {{ active_customers() }}

Now when the definition of "active" changes (and it will), you update it once instead of hunting through 47 different queries.

Modules: Organizing Your SQL Like Code

Stop putting all your SQL in one giant file. Seriously, stop.

Organize your SQL into modules—separate files grouped by purpose. A typical structure might look like:

sql/
  ├── staging/          # Raw data cleanup
  │   ├── stg_customers.sql
  │   └── stg_orders.sql
  ├── marts/            # Business logic
  │   ├── fct_sales.sql
  │   └── dim_customers.sql
  └── utils/            # Reusable functions
      └── date_helpers.sql

Each file does one thing. You can test each piece independently. You can find the code you need without scrolling through 3,000 lines of SQL. And when someone asks "where's the customer logic?" you can actually point them to a specific place.

Performance: Where Theory Meets Reality

Here's what nobody tells you about production SQL: that query that runs in 50ms on your laptop with 10,000 rows will take 30 seconds in production with 50 million rows. And your users will absolutely notice.

Materialized views are your insurance policy against angry users. They pre-compute expensive aggregations and store the results. Yes, they take up space. Yes, you need to refresh them. But they turn "we need to wait for the dashboard to load" into "the dashboard loads instantly."

The trade-off is real: you're exchanging storage space and occasional refresh time for consistent query performance. In production, this is almost always worth it.

Indexes are the other half of the performance equation. They're like the table of contents in a book—sure, you can read every page to find what you want, but having an index makes it a lot faster. The catch? Every index slows down writes (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE) a little bit. You need to find the balance for your workload.

Testing: Yes, You Need It

If your SQL isn't tested, it's not production-grade. Full stop.

This doesn't mean you need a full testing framework day one, but tools like sqlfluff for linting and sqlt (SQL Test) for unit testing exist for a reason. Here's what a simple SQL test might look like:

-- Test that sales aggregation is correct
WITH test_data AS (
    SELECT 100 as expected_total
),
actual_data AS (
    SELECT SUM(amount) as actual_total
    FROM sales_summary
    WHERE date = '2024-01-01'
)
SELECT 
    CASE 
        WHEN expected_total = actual_total THEN 'PASS'
        ELSE 'FAIL: Expected ' || expected_total || ' but got ' || actual_total
    END as test_result
FROM test_data, actual_data;

Not fancy, but it works. You can run these tests before deploying changes and catch issues before your users do. The databases that don't collapse six months in are the ones where someone wrote tests. Be that someone.

Of course, there is so much more! Window functions, partitioning strategies, query optimization techniques, transaction isolation levels, database migrations—we could write entire books about each of these topics (and people have). But here's the thing you need to know right now:

The Real Skill: Knowing What Belongs Where

Production-grade SQL isn't about using every feature your database offers. It's about knowing where each piece of logic belongs.

Data validation? Database constraints.
Complex multi-step calculations? Stored procedures.
Repeated business logic? Views.
Application-specific stuff? Keep it in the application.

The developers who make systems that actually work don't force everything through one layer. They use the right tool at the right layer. Sometimes that's SQL. Sometimes it's not. The skill is knowing which.

It's Just Another Programming Language

SQL isn't a stepping stone to "real" development. It's not a necessary evil you tolerate until you can hide behind an ORM. It's a legitimate programming language that's been running production systems since before most of us were born.

The question isn't whether SQL can handle production requirements. It's whether you know enough SQL to use it properly when it matters.

What's your biggest production SQL war story? I'm always curious about the real-world challenges people face with their databases. Drop me a line— I'd love to hear about it.

Share this article

LinkedIn Twitter